MGF, Master Grumble Framer
Yes, 92% is a high figure, Robo . . . and I believe if looked at objectively (with clarity and other handling benefits from the Groglass, Schott, old Denglas coating process), 92% is right up there to be considered as a glazing for conservation / preservation grade framing.Given the exact same artwork, hanging in the exact same lighting conditions , matted/mounted in the exact same way, bar the glass, what difference, in years, would 99% vv 92% make?
99% is obviously almost maximum, but isn't 92% still 'high'?
No one has spoken of pricing benefits as yet (if any) and distribution.
In the long run the market will decide if this is a viable alternative.
Certainly has people talking about it !