• WELCOME Grumblers
    Backup is now done at 3PM EDT. You may find the server down for up to two minutes at that time.

Question What markup for Tru Vue Glass?

seligart

Grumbler
I need advice here.
I have received an order to frame 3 very high quality prints. The photographer
who took the photos said they were printed with an Epson printer and the color could last up to 200years!
The sizes in cm and the cost to me-
71/48 Quoted 84$
63/61 $92
91/61 $130 these prices for 99%museum glass.
He wants to use Tru Vue museum glass or 92%protection against UV.
I live in Israel so these prices are probably not what you'd pay in USA.
The client is a visiting American tourist.
Any advice on what markup to charge will be greatly appreciated. Thank you everyone
in advance.
 
Sponsor Wanted

CB Art & Framing

SGF, Supreme Grumble Framer
If the client is going to take back framed pictures to USA, I would recommend using Consevation acrylic.
Markup is whatever you choose, but base it on full sheets.
200 year prints doesn't necessarily mean they cost a lot to print. If the photographer owns the digital files, he can easily have them reprinted.
 

seligart

Grumbler
If the client is going to take back framed pictures to USA, I would recommend using Consevation acrylic.
Markup is whatever you choose, but base it on full sheets.
200 year prints doesn't necessarily mean they cost a lot to print. If the photographer owns the digital files, he can easily have them reprinted.
Thank you for your input, but no the pictures are for friends and won't be bought back to the States.
 

prospero

SPFG, Supreme Picture Framing God
The thought occurs that if the prints are so lightfast then why use museum glass? Good prints
are very resistant to fading. Hanging them in a place out of direct sunlight will do much more
in terms of protection than any amount of filtered glass.

No reason not to be extra cautious, but in the UK museum glass is about x3 as expensive as
an AR glass which is about x10 dearer than standardd float.
I use Ultravue70. Which allegedly filters 70% UV. Much the same as standard float.

I tend to use museum glass only on very expensive art that demands the ultimate protection, or
on things that are more vulnerable to light damage such as older prints that were done in dodgy
pigments, old embroideries and prints/documents that people have signed with ink. o_O
 

seligart

Grumbler
The thought occurs that if the prints are so lightfast then why use museum glass? Good prints
are very resistant to fading. Hanging them in a place out of direct sunlight will do much more
in terms of protection than any amount of filtered glass.

No reason not to be extra cautious, but in the UK museum glass is about x3 as expensive as
an AR glass which is about x10 dearer than standardd float.
I use Ultravue70. Which allegedly filters 70% UV. Much the same as standard float.

I tend to use museum glass only on very expensive art that demands the ultimate protection, or
on things that are more vulnerable to light damage such as older prints that were done in dodgy
pigments, old embroideries and prints/documents that people have signed with ink. o_O
 

seligart

Grumbler
I agree with you, but he has a a belt and braces attitude to his work.
Wants to give it the best chance for future generations to view his work I suppose.
 

Daniel Smith

True Grumbler
If the client is going to take back framed pictures to USA, I would recommend using Consevation acrylic.
Markup is whatever you choose, but base it on full sheets.
200 year prints doesn't necessarily mean they cost a lot to print. If the photographer owns the digital files, he can easily have them reprinted.
Maybe not to the specs of the original print that was to be framed. The specific papers used may no longer be available for whatever reason. Some of us use specific papers for a particular look to the print or due to a specific quality need. Really puts us up the tree when we may be asked later for a print and can't get that "look" any longer because the material used is no longer in the marketplace.
 

Bob Carter

SPFG, Supreme Picture Framing God
Back to the original question, I would determine market pricing to get a sense of what others charge. That's what consumers care about. Then determine if that price yields a satisfactory margin.

Suppose you are selling Museum grade widgets. Retail Prices in your Market range from $10 to 25 and most are inthe $20 range. You pay $5 a widget and someone says 2X is proper. But the market yields more, for some much more. Is 2x still good? Shouldn't you sell it for more?

Suppose you pay $10 a widget and someone says 3x making you higher, much higher. Is that good? Just because you want more doesn't mean the market will support more. Your costs determine your margin; the market determines your Retail. Massage to get a 'best price', not a 'set' markup

at least, that's pretty much what most folks in biz do
 
Sponsor Wanted
Top